The Leadership Gap Assessment
You are not measured here. You are compared.
The distance between how you believe you are leading and how your team experiences being led. Not a 360; two accounts of the same ninety days, laid beside each other.
Why it exists
Most bottlenecks don’t know they are one.
Read moreShow less
Built on Leading Magnanimously. A Doer-Leader is typically a knowledge, execution and human growth bottleneck, and most of the time does not know it, or will fight to remain in denial. This instrument measures the does not know it.
$7,495
One flat price covers up to 100 respondents, plus the ninety minute debrief.
- Your own twenty-item anchor set; answered first, locked on submission
- Up to 100 respondents across directs, indirects, peers and the people above you
- Anonymity enforced in the database, with release thresholds that cannot be overridden
- The divergence report; your position, their position, and the direction of the distance
- Eight dimensions traced to named chapters of Leading Magnanimously
- A ninety minute debrief with Andrew, on site or remote; the report is not released without it
Already agreed with Andrew? Start your assessment · Your assessments
Eight dimensions
All of them from the book.
Autonomy in practice
Whether people actually decide, or decide then check.
Cornerstone: Autonomy · Let Them Decide
Safe failure
What happens the moment something goes wrong.
Let Them Fail · Own Their Failures
Voice and dissent
Whether disagreement is survivable.
Let Them Debate
Credit and cover
Who is named upward, and who absorbs the hit.
Let Them Own Their Successes · Own Their Failures
Consistency
Whether the reaction is predictable.
Be Consistent · Be Deliberate
The Why
Whether they understand rationale or only instruction.
Intent: the why leading into the what
Being known
Whether he knows them as people.
Heart · Be Empathetic · Let Them Be
Accountability and growth
Whether standards are held or absorbed.
Hold Them Accountable
Questions leaders ask
Is this a 360?
No. A 360 asks people to rate a person on traits, produces averaged adjectives and gets gamed on both sides. This asks both parties to report observable events inside a stated window of time, then subtracts. Nobody is rated. Two accounts of the same ninety days are compared.
What stops the leader gaming his own answers?
He answers first and his set locks on submission. No edit, no retake, no second look. He never sees who has completed, only how many.
Will my team tell the truth?
They are never asked their opinion of him. They are asked what happened to them. That is a different question, and it is one people answer honestly because it is defensible in the room afterwards.
Not ready? Start with half the ledger.
Fourteen questions, one seat, no signup. About four minutes. Nothing is saved and nothing is emailed.
Take the free snapshot